back to The Coast of Utopia - 2

  

Stephen Dillane

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehearsal photos by Ivan Kyncl for the NT

Chicago Tribune

Friday December 6, 2002

Stoppard's 'Utopia' a sweeping achievement  (an excerpt)

by Richard Christiansen

LONDON -- The ever-busy world of London theater this season has produced two important premieres by two singular playwrights, Tom Stoppard and Caryl Churchill. Their vastly different new works -- Stoppard's running a little over nine hours and Churchill's clocking in at a mere 55 minutes -- are certain to have United States productions, and when they get to America, they are sure to cause a stir.

Stoppard's "The Coast of Utopia," which has just closed its run at the Royal National Theatre, is actually a trio of sequential but self-contained three-hour plays: "Voyage," "Shipwreck" and "Salvage."

Imaginative and intellectual

Like all of Stoppard's work, the trilogy is literary and literate; and, as with many of his earlier dramas, this one casts real-life historical figures in the playwright's imaginative unfolding of intellectual and cultural history. The time frame here is 1833 to 1868, and the protagonists are pre-Communist activists striving to move their backward Mother Russia from czarist repression into a brave new world of freedom.

They all begin as bright young "revolutionaries with secret arsenals of social theory," and the survivors end as aged, scarred warriors still looking for that better world to come.

Ever the diligent researcher, Stoppard has peppered their personal histories with information on the political and philosophical movements of their time. Indeed, with its long monologues and stretches of polite, sophisticated debate, "Utopia" sometimes seems less like a play of action than a showcase for a brilliant, if somewhat longwinded, lecturer.

But playgoers need not prepare for "Utopia" as if studying for a history exam. The people of the drama are not encyclopedia entries; they are individual human beings, with distinguishing traits and flaws, who live in a richly evoked place and time. Moreover, Stoppard's abiding humanism and dazzling use of the English language give a dynamic contemporary thrust to these 19th Century issues.

Superb direction

In this extraordinary effort, he was helped immeasurably by the epic proportions of director Trevor Nunn's magnificent production. Using a giant turntable in the National's Olivier auditorium, Nunn swiftly carried the story from Russia to France to Switzerland and back, with designer William Dudley's video projections, thrown on a huge background cyclorama, adding amazing depth to every scene.

The acting was of the first order, with special mention going to the steady fire of Stephen Dillane's complex socialist philosopher Alexander Herzen, the ebullient eruptions of Douglas Henshall's perpetually agitated agitator Mikhail Bukanin and the galvanizing passion of Will Keen's eccentric critic Vissarion Belinsky, whose blistering fist-act aria on the glories of literature is one of the drama's highlights.

Producing Stoppard's ambitious work is a huge undertaking and a great risk. At the National, the plays did well at the box office when presented sequentially in 12-hour (with lunch and dinner breaks) marathons on Saturdays, but not so well in their individual weekday outings. That suggests financial problems for American professional theaters, which would be faced with the daunting amount of time, personnel and money that "The Coast of Utopia" demands. However and whenever the American version does happen, it will be hard-pressed to equal the theatrical firepower that Nunn and company, with their deep resources, gave to Stoppard's sweeping achievement.

Financial Times

Monday December 30, 2002

THE ARTS: Bumpy ride still offered many thrills  (an excerpt)

by Alastair Macaulay

Some plays lodge lines or images in your head. I find myself still recalling Penelope Wilton, as Sonya in Brian Friel's Afterplay, speaking with quiet tenderness of Astrov, the man she has loved for 20 years, as "a man with a vision, a close to saintliness, and not always sober". Or Stephen Dillane as Herzen drawing Tom Stoppard's Coast of Utopia to a close by saying "History knocks at a thousand gates at every moment, and the gatekeeper is chance. We need wit and courage to make our way while our way is making us. A distant end is not an end but a trap. The end we work for must be closer, the labourer's wage, the pleasure in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness."  ...

I count myself privileged just to have heard and seen these moments, and doubly privileged to have the responsibility of reviewing them. A fellow critic contacted me this autumn; he was preparing a piece on "What's wrong with British theatre?" and wanted to know my thoughts on the subject. But my immediate response was to ask him to tell me what, if anything, is wrong with it?  ...

How much can be wrong with British theatre when the past year has brought us premieres by Alan Ayckbourn, Caryl Churchill, Brian Friel, David Hare; a miniature by Harold Pinter, and a whole trilogy by Tom Stoppard? And acting by Judi Dench, Stephen Dillane, Michael Gambon, Clare Higgins, John Hurt, Vanessa Redgrave, Mark Rylance, Maggie Smith, Penelope Wilton? Sure, some of those plays and some of those performances were minor - Dench and Smith in Hare's The Breath of Life may have done the biggest advance sale in West End history, yet turned out to be just a charming non-event - but they alone ensure that London remains the theatre capital of the world. And there has been much else.  ...

The whole year has been one of transition to an uncertain future. The National Theatre is drawing its Trevor Nunn era to a close and preparing for its Nicholas Hytner regime; the Donmar Warehouse has only just begun a new regime under Michael Grandage; the Hampstead Theatre is being rebuilt, and the Almeida Theatre has been closed for extensive rebuilding all year. These are the theatres that do most to generate energy. We may be preparing for a new phase of theatre glory, but don't count on it. In the meantime, hang on to the most luminous images of the past year: "the pleasure in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness".

Time

Sunday November 24, 2002

That Old Feeling: Theater Past, Theater Perfect  (an excerpt)

Richard Corliss on the new season of London plays

Have you ever traveled 6,000 miles to attend a single cultural event? I did, last month. The event was "The Coast of Utopia," a trilogy of Tom Stoppard plays directed by Trevor Nunn for the National Theatre in London. With a running (or ambling) time of 9hrs.30min, a cast of 30 adults and 15 children, and an elaborate physical production, "The Coast of Utopia" was unlikely to be mounted anywhere else. I had to be there.

Besides, I owed Stoppard. Since the mid-60s, with "Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," he has gifted me and countless others with some of the most intelligent, playful, sublime evenings of theater: "Jumpers," "The Real Thing" and the never-to-be-topped "Arcadia," to name three of a dozen offspring of his fertile imagination. Seized by the irresistible impulse to find out what Stoppard had in mind about 19th century Russian socialists, and abetted by the gracious offices of Aisha Labi, TIME Europe's Florence Nightingale for wayward visitors, I entered the National bunker for my Stoppard marathon one autumn Saturday morning.

Morning? Ah, that was the final lure: True acolytes could spend all day and most of the night on that Utopian coast. On weekdays, one or two of the plays were performed, but each Saturday the National put on a grand Stoppardian bouffe. The first of the trilogy, "Voyage," began at 11 and ended at 2:15; the second part, "Shipwreck," commenced at 3:15 and went till 6:30; and the finale, "Salvage," started at 7:30 and let out around 10:45. As a theater-binger from way back (the Royal Shakespeare Company's "Nicholas Nickleby," Bill Bryden's production of "The Miracles" for the National), I welcomed the chance for total immersion in non-stop-Stoppard with 2500 like-minded pilgrims.

"The Coast of Utopia" was part of a trifecta of new works by top English playwrights. London this fall also has on offer "A Number" by Caryl Churchill — of "Cloud Nine" and "Top Girls" glory —and David Hare's "The Breath of Life," a star vehicle for Maggie Smith and Judi Dench. (Would you import the Irishman Brian Friel to join this exalted company? I wouldn't, quite, but Friel had a new piece too: "Afterplay," a slight memory-play with old charmers John Hurt and Penelope Wilton as characters from Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard" and "Three Sisters.") . . .

PAST PERFECT

The early word on "The Coast of Utopia" was daunting: a nine-hour political debate, freely adapted from Isaiah Berlin's book of essay on "Russian Thinkers." Alexander Herzen, Mikhail Bakunin, Peter Chaadaev, Nicholas Ogarev: discuss their theories of social progress. Anyone? Anyone? Before seeing the plays I boned up on 19th century Russian radicals by reading the fact-packed 88-page program; by the time the lights went down Saturday morning, I felt ready to be a contestant on "Masterminds." Only with Stoppard does the theatergoer have to cram for a show.

Not to worry. As with Stoppard's last play, "The Invention of Love," the degree of difficulty here was exaggerated. Stoppard is a superb teacher, but he's mainly a showman, a seducer, an intellectual spieler who doesn't dare lose his engaged audience for a moment. Though the play spans 35 years, six countries and a dozen or so complex political philosophies, the contours are clear. Alexander Herzen (played by Stephen Dillane with that knowing, helpless smile he put to such attentive use in the recent revival of "The Real Thing") loves the play of ideas, loves the possibility for constructive social change, loves his wife and children more. The discovery of an infidelity wounds him like the news of a Tsarist outrage; the shipwreck of his deaf child collapses upon him like the failed revolutions of 1848.

The first words of the first play — "Speaking of which..." — cue "The Coast of Utopia" as part of an ongoing debate, passionate and civilized and open to irrelevancies. The trilogy celebrates the fine art of talking: rhetoric, invective, verbal violence and flirtation, impromptu essays that generate heat and light. Much of modernist art, and nearly all of popular culture, is suspicious of articulation. Modernism says that art and passion are precisely those things that can't be put into words; that the roiling impulses that rule are lives are either ineffable or just F---able. But the history of theater is an honor roll of articulate talk; the Greeks and Shakespeare, Corneille and Shaw thought so, and Stoppard is their avatar. Not talk for talk's sake — though why not, when he's so good at it? — but to clarify thorny ideas and to reveal thickety feelings.

In "Utopia," the men argue politics, spot lapses in their opponents' logic while stitching up the holes in their own. Or they follow the train of a piquant proposition and find they have talked themselves into a terminus. Do they contradict themselves? Very well, they contradict themselves. And they have such fun doing so; this is revolution as parlor sport. But the chat has gravity, for at issue is the question of how men shall live. Stoppard, himself a child refugee from the Soviet bloc, has embraced liberal humanism — human-ness, humaneness — in all his work. At the very end of the trilogy, when he bequeaths Herzen one final speech to rebut Marx's theory of historical inevitability, Stoppard is doubtless speaking for himself in articulating an enlightened middle way, the heroism of small graces:

"But history has no culmination! There is always as much in front as behind. There is no libretto. History knocks at a thousand gates at every moment, and the gatekeeper is chance. ... We need wit and courage to make our way while our way is making us. ... What kind of beast is this ... this Moloch who promises us that everything will be beautiful after we're dead? A distant end is not an end but a trap. The end we work for must be closer: the labourer's wage, the pleasure in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness... we have to open men's eyes and not tear them out."

And the women: do they get to talk? Yes, and when they do a small smile plays on their faces, as if they know that their matters of the heart will create more joy and crush more souls than "Das Kapital." Yes, their coquettery and evasions can exasperate men looking for an unequivocal answer to riddles of life and love. And when men have triumphed in their arguments with women, the women play their ace: they say, as Molly Bloom did, "Yes." This is the last word of the first and third "Utopia" plays; in each case it is spoken indulgently, as a mother would to calm a child's questing, questioning spirit. The political theories of Bakunin, Herzen and their coteries were expressions of a dream for universal betterment. As Shaw and Stoppard know, men are the dreamers, women the realists. Women are the land men return to when Utopia has faded or their ship foundered.

FUTURE CONDITIONAL

I find that I am romanticizing my reaction to "The Coast of Utopia." The trilogy is perhaps an hour, perhaps a play, too long. But I know why I am in a mood to wave away what I might have considered its excesses and obscurities. I just realized that the play is closing today, and may never be performed again (though a New York visit has been discussed). It is as if a dear friend, who had enthralled and exasperated me, who talked so fast and stayed so long, were suddenly reported absent, or missing, or lost at sea. Would I think of his faults? No, I would enumerate his virtues, in grief and gratitude.

As I type these words on a Saturday morning on an island in the Caribbean, it is noon at the National Theatre; the characters and the play are young, full of hope and vinegar. As my editor reads this column just after noon, the 1848 Revolution is giving Marx and his followers some brazen ideas, and a dear, deaf, dead child is wandering through the inaudible murmur of adult conversation. And if you, reader, happen to be scanning these words at sunset on Saturday, know that the cast is taking one last bow, and the audience — many, I'll warrant, who have seen the trilogy before and have returned for a last glimpse of the monument — is rising to salute the heroic craft of the author and actors.

What is to become of this monument? Edwin Booth said an actor was "a sculptor in snow." The gifted company of "The Coast of Utopia" sculpted a grand and intimate panorama of 19th century Europe from the marble of Stoppard's teeming brain. Tonight at 11, the sculpture begins to melt. It may be frozen — a living frieze — in the memories of those who saw the piece assembled, five nights a week and three times on Saturday. It is can be admired in its one official preserved form, on paper, and surely the plays read wonderfully in their published form. But print is both the fetus and the ghost of a theater piece. Reading a play, you know what it means but not how it feels.

The thrilling and melancholy fact is, you have to be there: in a crowd, watching these actors recombine uniquely, with all of tonight's little gaffes and unexpected epiphanies, at this moment, for their art and your pleasure. At its best a play restores, for a few hours, the age of belief. It gives you the shiver of a sacred rite, in a secular cathedral, and what you experience is communion. Can't get that with a book, where it's just you and the words. Can't get it at the movies, where the performers have been caught in aspic, and the snowman is cryogenically preserved. Only theater traps and enfolds you in the present tense — and then it is past.

It is the special gift of those who visited the National Theatre to know how the ship rocked, what birds of political fancy flew overhead, and when the rainbow of intellect and heart shone as we sailed past the coast of Utopia.

The New Yorker

Monday September 16, 2002

A Stoppard Panorama of Russian Idealism 

by Benedict Nightingale

"When in doubt, speculate. Enter the picture," Tom Stoppard has said. In his ambitious trilogy about prerevolutionary intellectual life in Russia, "The Coast of Utopia" (at London's Royal National Theatre), which requires thirty actors, two hundred and seventy-one costumes, and more than nine hours, Stoppard has imagined himself into the sect of renegade mid-nineteenth-century thinkers for whom the word "intelligentsia" was coined, and whose heady debates about their homeland's moral, intellectual, and political vacuum sowed the seeds of revolution both in the Russian Empire and far beyond its borders. His saga is battened primarily to four major figures: the essayist Alexander Herzen (1812-70), whom Sir Isaiah Berlin called "a kind of Russian Voltaire," the equal of Marx and Tocqueville as a social observer but as a moralist "more interesting and original than either"; the novelist Ivan Turgenev (1818-83); the literary critic and Savonarola of his generation Vissarion Belinsky (1811-48); and the agitator Mikhail Bakunin (1814-76). From their lives and ideas, Stoppard, whose plays were at one time banned in the Soviet Union, manufactures an epic whose greatest achievement is to show history as irony on the move.

"With fearless step we march to the very limit, and go beyond it; never out of step with the dialectic, only with the truth," wrote Herzen, who saw the oppression of the tsarist state as the problem and a democratic revolution as the solution. "We have to open men's eyes and not tear them out," he explains in the play. Inevitably, Stoppard is drawn to the amiable Herzen, who shares with him a certain intellectual gaiety, a gentleness, and the ability to turn ambivalence into artful expression, if not always effective action. Although Herzen (the poised, excellent Stephen Dillane) does not appear until the second part of the first play in the trilogy, "Voyage," his story and his gnarly inquiry into social change form the core of "The Coast of Utopia." "Voyage," which is the most fragmented of the three plays, dramatizes the infection of German Romantic idealism among the Russian upper classes of the eighteen-thirties. (Russia's censorship of political expression gave new ideas the status of holy dogma but also encouraged an absolutist frame of mind—which in the end proved equally disastrous.) The women acted it out in romance, the men in revolution. "Shipwreck," the second and most successful play, embraces exile, the growth of Russian social criticism between 1846 and 1852, and the revolutionaries' disappointment at the failure of the Paris Revolt of 1848, along with the death of Herzen's wife and son and his subsequent move to England. Stoppard is at his best when lampooning the cultural division between the Slavophiles and the Westernizers. "Go to France for your cravats if you must, but why do you have to go to France for your ideas?" one Slavophile says. To which Turgenev (the lanky, droll Guy Henry) replies, "Because they're in French. You can publish anything you like in France, extraordinary." The third play, "Salvage," deals with the rise and fall of Herzen's newspaper, The Bell, the first significant Russian publication to lob revolutionary ideas into the motherland, and with the reaction of the new generation of revolutionaries, who believe in progress through the application of scientific principles, to the "men of the forties." (Despite Stoppard's claim to the contrary, the plays, to my mind, need to be seen in historical sequence.)

Scratch a rebel and you'll find money from home. Except for the provincial Belinsky (superbly played by Will Keen), who has to earn his crust by writing literary reviews, the revolutionaries in Stoppard's tale are men of inherited means—the "repentant gentry," as Turgenev piquantly puts it—who are all too aware that what's good for the pike is death to the minnow. "Guilt was the psychological inspiration of the revolution," Orlando Figes writes in his masterly history "A People's Tragedy." In the best scene in "Voyage," Herzen sits at an ice rink in 1834, watching festive skaters and fulminating to a university friend, the philosopher Nicholas Stankevich (Raymond Coulthard), about the disparity between the frivolous surface of Moscow life and its barbarous reality. "The Kritski brothers disappeared for insulting the Tsar's portrait," he says. "Antonovich and his friends for forming a secret society, meaning they met in somebody's room to read a pamphlet you can buy on the street in Paris. Young men and women are pairing off like swans on the skating ground. There is something wrong with this picture."

What's wrong with Stoppard's stage picture is that the drama is in the wings; what's onstage is just talk. Stankevich uses Hegelian categories to detach himself from the horror that Herzen denounces. "Reform can't come from above or below, only from within," he says. "The material world is nothing but the shadow on the wall of the cave." Perhaps because Stoppard's interest lies in the history of ideas and not in social history, Trevor Nunn's production adopts a similar strategy. Its hubbub—a revolving stage; the shifting panels of a cyclorama onto which William Dudley's sumptuous video locations are projected; the ballroom gavottes and the revolutionary hoopla—camouflages the stasis at the core of the play. The arbitrary brutality of the governing classes, state censorship, the pettifogging bureaucracy, the corrupt clergy—all the stifling ingredients of Russian life that created the climate for revolution—are alluded to in "The Coast of Utopia," but they are not fleshed out. The serfs, who made up a third of the empire, are conveyed here as a handful of ragged, spectral presences with dirty clothes and clean fingernails, and the violence meted out to them is only notionally acknowledged. (A serf is struck by Bakunin's mother and runs away crying. In real life, by contrast, Turgenev's grandmother hit a young serf and then, irritated by his outcry, smothered him to death.)

Sometime around 1995, according to his biographer Ira Nadel, Stoppard was entering the London Library with an armful of books when he bumped into the theatre critic Michael Billington. "Just returning my new play," Stoppard quipped. In "The Coast of Utopia," he has put his reading into his art, but not enough art into his reading. The pageant of philosophical fervor certainly suits his reflective temperament. "I'm the kind of person who embarks on an endless leapfrog down the great moral issues," he said in a 1972 interview. "I put a position, rebut it, refute the rebuttal and rebut the refutation. Forever." But here, ironically, with so many "isms" being bandied about—"Hegelianism," "Slavism," "populism," "obscurantism," "dialectical materialism"—the only "ism" missing is dynamism. Stoppard makes the ideological disputes cogent, but his glib narrative shorthand lends itself to synthesis, not to psychology. As a result, the ideas are given life, but the characters are not. The trilogy is like an unfinished portrait, the head rich in detail and the heart merely a wash of color. You don't know enough for the human drama to be compelling, and the plot begs more questions than it answers.

Nonetheless, no time in Stoppard's company is ever wasted. In giving us news of Herzen, who believed in both radical action and the limits of terror, he brings back into our dangerous world an articulate cautionary voice. "Life's bounty is in its flow," Herzen says. "Where is the song when it's been sung? The dance when it's been danced? It's only we humans who want to own the future, too." Stoppard's discourse, it seems, is meant to free us from the spell of abstract nouns, which Herzen called "the syphilis of our revolutionary passions," and which rationalize the violent solution as a historical necessity. "There is no libretto," Herzen reminds us. "We need wit and courage to make our way while our way is making us." The trilogy's brilliant final monologue—Herzen's answer to the absolutes of his day and ours—alone is worth the price of admission:

The destroyers wear nihilism like a cockade—they think they destroy because they are radicals. But they destroy because they're disappointed conservatives—let down by the ancient dream of a perfect society of squarable circles, where conflict is cancelled out. But there is no such place, that's why it's called utopia. Until we stop killing our way towards it, we won't be grown up as human beings. Our meaning doesn't depend on us transcending the imperfect reality we've got. How we live it is our meaning, in our time. We have no other.

Wall Street Journal

Tuesday September 10, 2002

Stoppard's Russian Evolution

by Paul Levy

London -- "The Coast of Utopia" comprises three three-hour plays on the intellectual precursors of the Russian Revolution. Is Tom Stoppard's new undertaking at the Royal National Theatre the product of ambition or vanity?   

Nobody but Sir Tom, the world's undisputed champion dramatic wordsmith (even Hollywood agrees -- there was an Oscar for "Shakespeare in Love"), could get a theater management to agree to stage a trio of long, wordy plays on such an unpromising, apparently static theme. But Sir Tom is a playwright of a different stripe. In 2000 he received Britain's highest honor, the Order of Merit, normally awarded for intellectual distinction. And having seen all three plays in a single day, I can testify that what Sir Tom has wrought is not a monument to his own ego, but a remarkable and genuine theatrical landmark.   

Trevor Nunn's direction, and William Dudley's historically precise costumes, simple revolving sets, and imaginative video rear-projections of places and interiors add greatly to the coherence of the dramas. But having earlier seen one play on its own, I've no doubt that the Saturday marathon performances (on Sept. 14, Oct. 5, 12 and 19) are the ideal way to see the plays titled "Voyage," "Shipwreck" and "Salvage."   

It is not impossible to remember the Russian-novel-length cast of characters, but it is not so easy to keep in mind the nuances of their positions on the important issues -- the Westernizing and modernizing of Czarist Russia, the isolation, rootlessness and lack of a sense of belonging of the educated elite, the institution of serfdom, censorship and political repression, and reform vs. revolution. Seeing the pieces sequentially and at a minimum interval helps.   

After the failure of the constitutionalist, republican Decembrist movement in December 1825, the new Czar, Nicholas I, installed his thought police to contain and punish the enthusiasm of the tiny minority of educated Russians for the ideals of the Enlightenment and French Revolution. Sir Tom's chief protagonist, Alexander Herzen, and Herzen's friend Nikolai Ogarev had vowed as adolescents to carry on the Decembrists' struggle, but they were jailed and then banished in the mid-1830s.   

"Voyage," however, opens in the summer of 1833 at Premukhino, the country estate of the family of the eventual anarchist Michael Bakunin ("the passion to destroy is also a creative passion"), and the audience realizes almost at once that this agreeable existence rests on a system of slavery where a person's wealth is not measured by the extent of the land he owns, but on how many "souls" (serfs) it sustains. You don't have to be Karl Marx (who turns up later, and plays only a minor role in the trilogy) to spot the contradiction.   

After the defeat of the European revolutions of 1848 (in the course of the second play, whose title and controlling metaphor is "Shipwreck"), Herzen found himself unable to identify either with utopian socialism or with the destructive instincts of the revolutionary masses, and declared: "We do not proclaim a new goal, but we expose the old lies." He is Sir Tom's hero because, though he agrees with the novelist Turgenev (whose character, played beautifully by Guy Henry, makes you aware of the elegance of the lifestyle of the class denoted by the new word "intelligentsia") that history has no purpose, no single goal, and is ruled by chance, Herzen saw that even socialism was no solution. It, too, would generate contradictions that would require a revolution to resolve.   

Herzen's denial of universal solutions to humanity's problems, his view that each generation is different, and is an end in itself, not a means to a better future, is as congenial to post-Soviet Europeans as it is now to the American Left. But can you really make a drama from ideas, especially ideas as complex and subtle as these?   

Sir Tom truly gives it his best, but the exposition requires a certain number of monologues, and the texts of the trilogy contain an awful lot of dense pages of type. These could do with trimming, though the actors who deliver them -- Douglas Henshall as Michael Bakunin, Raymond Coulthard as the charismatic philosopher Stankevich, Will Keen as the lower-class literary critic Belinsky, Simon Day as Herzen's best friend Ogarev and, above all, Stephen Dillane as Herzen -- manage to be convincingly in character for the long stretches of time they are on stage.   

There is the suspicion, too, that the romantic subplots are window-dressing for the ideas. Chief of these is Ogarev's willing surrender of his wife, Natalie (Lucy Whybrow), to Herzen. Natalie, the best friend of Herzen's late wife takes over the exiled Herzen household, while her husband finds solace in Mary Sutherland, an engaging, gold-hearted London prostitute. Eve Best, who in several roles is the outstanding female performer in the trilogy, plays Mrs. Herzen -- also named Natalie -- and seizes the opportunity of her character's death from grief after the drowning of their young son to show her dramatic range.   

Somehow, with the thrust stage filled with picnics, parties and crowds of emigre revolutionaries, Sir Tom brings it off. At the end you don't feel you've sat through nearly nine hours of sermons and lectures or watched a philosophy seminar in costume. You've experienced the emotional force of some ideas that are important to our own times. You've watched the development of some characters you care about. You've been entertained, yes, and sometimes moved.

UPI

Tuesday August 27, 2002

Theater: 'The Coast of Utopia'

by Stephen Brown

LONDON, Aug. 27 (UPI) -- Theater on a grand scale implicitly rebukes those who would treat drama as a diversion. In very different ways, Goethe's "Faust," Ibsen's "Peer Gynt," Wagner's operas, and the daylong mystery cycles still occasionally revived in York and Chester all lay claim to a reach and seriousness too great for the usual evening-show-with-dinner-to-follow routine.

"The Coast of Utopia," Tom Stoppard's new trilogy about the personal and private struggles of Russia's mid-19th century intelligentsia belongs to this same genre of event theater.

London's National Theatre has added to the sense of occasion by opening the trilogy at the beginning of August, when London theater is generally quiet and the media turns its attention to the carnival mish-mash of Edinburgh's overlapping arts festivals. As several critics have commented, "The Coast of Utopia" bears an unhappy resemblance to the bourgeois radicals it chronicles: relentless and sometimes magnificent in its ambition, rather less successful in its concrete achievements. Yet it is also rich and fascinating, the work of a writer in his fifth decade of productivity extending and risking his writing at a time when most of his generation of British playwrights seem sadly diminished.

It raises the question why a writer so distant from the grand seriousness and self-assertion of this kind of theater -- a writer whose plays are often scintillating chamber pieces -- should decide to write an epic.

The marketing material for "The Coast of Utopia" claims that it consists of "three sequential self-contained plays" but one senses that this formulation derives more from a fear of intimidating the audience than the nature of the plays themselves.

"The Coast of Utopia" is really a single 9-hour play, with an architecture that needs to be taken as a whole, sweeping from youth to age and from hope through catastrophe to renewed but chastened effort. With the help of Trevor Nunn's dynamic and fleet-footed direction and William Dudley's cinematic design work, projecting moving video backdrops onto a curving backdrop, it cuts a swathe through European history, following a cast of more than 90 speaking characters from 1833 to 1865.

The first play, "Voyage," centers on the impetuous young radical Michael Bakunin (Douglas Henshall), his rebellion powered by a terrifying, blind egotism and the heady philosophical romanticism of German idealism. While he enthuses about the philosophies of Schelling, Fichte and Hegel, each suggesting a different view about the nature of self and reality, Bakunin's selfishness in the mundane world wrecks the marital prospects of his doting sisters and makes him a continual burden on his friends.

The second play, "Shipwreck," continues to follow Bakunin but turns its attention more to the liberal socialist Alexander Herzen (a performance of intelligence and conviction from Stephen Dillane), Stoppard's hero, who had been exiled by the autocratic czar during the action of most of the first play. The title alludes to a double disaster. The disappointed dream of the 1848 revolution in Paris, in which both Bakunin and Herzen participated, occupies the first half of the play.

The second half turns to Herzen's personal calamity: the near-collapse of his marriage and then, through accident and illness, the precipitous loss of most of his family.

"Salvage," the third play, follows Herzen to London, where his money and sardonic intelligence make him a focus of the community of European radicals -- including Karl Marx, the French socialist Louis Blanc and the Italian nationalist Giuseppe Mazzini -- taking refuge there. As he campaigns at a distance for the emancipation of the serfs, a new generation of nihilists and militant socialists, deriding the efforts of "repentant gentry" like Herzen, foreshadow the Russian Revolution to come.

At the heart of his enterprise lies Stoppard's wish to celebrate and explore a more benign kind of political radicalism in Russia that offers a tantalizing alternative to the revolution of 1917. With the delusions of communist utopianism in mind, "The Coast of Utopia" repeatedly contrasts idealism, in politics, philosophy and love, with messy reality.

This is epic, historical theater written by someone who does not believe that history has logic or form. Chance regularly intrudes into the narrative. At one point Stoppard memorably personifies history as a huge ginger cat, playing with us and killing us at its whim. The scenes have an overlapping, chaotic quality of that owes an obvious debt to Chekhov. As ever, Stoppard juxtaposes big ideas with small, significant things -- a dropped penknife that becomes a mistaken love-token or the tuberculosis bacillus that foreshortens several characters' lives -- to suggest the sheer vanity of grand schemes.

Moment to moment, there is no question of Stoppard's assured skill. His dialogue is as witty and pithy as ever, his sense of comic absurdity undimmed. The sheer range of information he is able to bring to the stage is remarkable, guiding the audience with insouciant ease through the fashions of German philosophy, the fraught world of Russian literature and political publishing and the machinations of 19th century European political history.

Alongside Bakunin and Herzen, he creates two other rich and attractive main characters -- the nervous and furious critic Vissarion Belinksy (Will Keen on superbly splenetic form), and the wry, non-committal writer Ivan Turgenev (a gentlemanly Guy Henry) -- as well as scores of secondary ones.

The work's vices are born of passion. It is often as if Stoppard has fallen in love with his material and his characters to the point that he seems unwilling to leave anything out. Do we really need to know so much about Bakunin's family life, once the central point about his selfishness has been made? How interesting is Natalie Herzen's adulterous love affair with the narcissistic German poet George Herwegh? Stoppard binds together his narrative by repeating scenes, situations and symbols and by experimenting further, as in "Arcadia" and "The Invention of Love," with looping time schemes, but there are times when "The Coast of Utopia" sprawls.

The trilogy's most serious failing stems from Stoppard's hatred of communism. Stoppard's Turgenev extols the virtues of refusing to take sides, but it is not advice Stoppard takes himself.

Marx -- like the Slavophile thinker who appears briefly at the beginning of the second play -- is reduced to a caricature. Herzen, on the other hand, is too clearly the author's mouthpiece, given speech after speech attacking utopian delusion. Worse still, though it does convey what life was like for its middle-class heroes living under a repressive regime, "The Coast of Utopia" barely bothers to represent the sufferings of the serfs or the working classes who give the revolutionaries their political urgency.

This may be true to the narrow experiences of the revolutionaries themselves, but it makes the case for gradual, peaceful change too easy and the demands of the new generation of revolutionaries seem needlessly strident. When communism and grand political dreaming are anyway generally discredited, Stoppard's insistence on attacking them has the air of knocking on an open door.

In the end, "The Coast of Utopia" is successful almost in spite of its ideas. And although grossly overlong, the trilogy's force derives from its epic sweep.

For Stoppard's real theme is not so much political or intellectual as emotional and personal. In the third, most coherent, part of the trilogy, we see Herzen, a man who has lived through long years of happiness and suffering, first giving into apathy and then being spurred on to fight again. At its best, "The Coast of Utopia" extols a virtue that only epic theatre can truly show: persistence.

By the end -- in one of his few ideologically surprising moments -- Stoppard comes to admire even the unwearying, irrepressible energy of Bakunin's lunatic enthusiasms. Survival and tenacity are an older writer's themes. In his curious, uneven, sometimes brilliant epic, Stoppard has given them moving expression.

New York Times

Wednesday August 21, 2002

Great Minds Talk Volumes as Mortality Intervenes

by Ben Brantley

LONDON, Aug. 20 — Three little words open the floodgates: "Speaking of which. . . " This is the unexceptional phrase that so modestly begins "The Coast of Utopia," Tom Stoppard's engrossing and exasperating trilogy of plays at the Royal National Theater here about the intellectual forebears of the Russian Revolution.

The words are spoken by a dapper Russian landowner and patriarch, seated at the end of a well-appointed dinner table in 1833. The suggestion is that you have come upon the characters onstage in mid-conversation and that the conversation is likely to continue. That is a monumental understatement.

The Coast of Utopia:  Shipwreck

  Stephen Dillane and Douglas Henshall

Photo by Alastair Muir

During the more than nine hours required to perform all three of its parts, "The Coast of Utopia" takes the love of a good argument to spectacular extremes unknown in the theater since the heyday of George Bernard Shaw. The explosive, eloquent characters in the beautifully acted production of Mr. Stoppard's new work, which has been directed in bravura style by Trevor Nunn, are not making small talk.

No, the talk is as big as talk gets. For what are being discussed are, among other things, the fate of a nation, the philosophy of knowledge, the nature of history, the role of literature, the limits of love and the as yet undiscovered social system by which people can live in harmony and equality. There is also an abiding pained consciousness that language — and "Utopia" speaks in various foreign tongues — is desperately inadequate.

"Words just lead you on," says one character. "They arrange themselves every which way," filled with "promises they can't keep." It is fitting that among the trilogy's several stunning coups de théâtre the most memorable involves a deaf child surrounded by thundering silence.

The view from the 21st century confirms of course that the debates that dominate "Utopia" are not winnable. But any awareness of such futility does not stop the arguments' participants — who have resonant names like Bakunin, Turgenev, Marx, Belinsky and Herzen — from continuing to inspire, inflame, enrage, adore and bore one another. In this respect theatergoers will find it very easy to identify with them.

"The Coast of Utopia" has received courteous but very mixed reviews here, with "ambitious" looming admiringly and damningly. Yet on the single Saturday on which I saw all three plays (a time commitment of roughly 12 hours, allowing for bolted meals at the National's coffee bars), there were cancellation lines for every show. And as far as I could tell, no one failed to return after any of the intermissions, although I heard a few people grumbling about Stoppard's penchant for overwriting.

"The Coast of Utopia" deserves to be popular, though not for the reasons you might expect. It's not that the play's historical insights, which in truth aren't all that original, are good for you, like a high-fiber diet for the brain. Or that the Stoppardian epigrams (planted amid some frankly tedious speech making) sparkle.

What keeps audience members in their seats is Mr. Stoppard's passion and Mr. Nunn's gift for translating that heat into vibrantly human performances. They are provided by a superb cast led by the magnetic Stephen Dillane (a Tony winner for the revival of Mr. Stoppard's "Real Thing") as Alexander Herzen, the 19th-century radical theorist and editor, and Eve Best, an emotional powerhouse as Herzen's wife.

The pleasures of "Utopia," which is presented as a fairly straightforward narrative by Stoppard standards, are those of a fat novel that for all its long-windedness is a page turner.

From his "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" (1967) to "The Invention of Love" (1997), Mr. Stoppard has consistently assumed the role of the playwright as super-student, luxuriating in the joys of research and in the opportunity to take every side of a question. In this sense he is very much like the ever-searching intellectuals of "Utopia" who have, above all, the courage of their contradictions.

The plays ("Voyage," "Shipwreck" and "Salvage") follow an elastic set of adversarial friends over 25 years, from their shared, largely privileged youth in Russia to exile in Western Europe. It is a period during which the survivors age severely (and most convincingly, by theatrical standards). Yet as their role models shift from Schelling to Kant to Hegel to Marx, they hold on to an adolescent combativeness and a precocious student's enthusiasm for new ideas.

That "Utopia" feels shaped by the same sensibility accounts for much of what is wonderful and annoying in the plays. Despite its leisurely length, there is a quality of breathlessness throughout the trilogy, like that of a man who has so much to say, he fears his tongue will never keep up with his mind.

There is also the sometimes suffocating feeling of Mr. Stoppard as a researcher who is so enamored of his material that he cannot bear to leave out a single good anecdote he has come across. "Voyage," the first part of the trilogy, is by the far the most artfully arranged and judiciously edited of the three. But even as the work, like its characters, grows more ragged with time, it never comes close to collapsing.

The energy isn't only cerebral. Like "The Invention of Love," a portrait of the poet A. E. Housman, "Utopia" aches with an awareness of the irreconcilable tensions between ideas and mortal substance.

The mind can never fully impose itself upon or transcend life itself, as Herzen comes to accept; real life is too wayward and people too varied for that. "Utopia" both laments and celebrates this condition.

The ways in which Mr. Nunn's production achieves this double tone are ravishing. With the help of David Hersey's virtuosic lighting, William Dudley — who designed the sets, costumes and videos — brilliantly keeps "Utopia" in heady visual flight as it segues from a Russian dacha to the ballrooms of Moscow and St. Petersburg to the streets of Paris in 1848 and finally to the staggering assortment of houses in England and on the Continent that Herzen called home.

The idea of a world in unstoppable motion is conveyed most literally by an immense turntable, which takes up most of the stage of the Olivier Theater and which revolves obligingly to change the audience's perspective on a scene. Behind, on a cycloramic screen, are projected beautifully wrought images of landscapes and architecture that meld ingeniously with the more solid elements of the set.

The impression is of flux and things ephemeral, which makes the of-the-moment vividness of the performances all the more poignant. The ensemble members, who number several dozen in some 70 roles, are remarkably accomplished portraitists. They bring to fruition the impulse that must have inspired Mr. Stoppard to create their characters, that sense of gleeful curiosity that can overtake a reader when one fine detail suddenly brings a historical figure to life.

It should be pointed out that these performances and Mr. Nunn's staging go a long way in providing the novelistic richness and empathy of "Utopia." Unlike much of Mr. Stoppard's work, "Utopia" lives far more compellingly on the stage than on the page.

To cite standouts is to some degree arbitrary, since nearly everyone is first rate. But I find I'm still especially haunted by Douglas Henshall, who makes inevitable the fatuous but ardent Bakunin's transformation from aristocrat into anarchist; Will Keen, who manages to be both tongue-tied and irresistibly verbose as the literary critic Belinksy; and Ms. Best, who brings a heartbreaking quality of longing and frustrated fire to three different roles that speak eloquently of what it meant to be a woman in those times, among those men.

There are also, at the show's center, two men who embody different approaches to the relativism that shapes "Utopia": the passionately engaged and arrogant Herzen and the elegantly detached and equally arrogant novelist Turgenev, impeccably embodied by Mr. Dillane and Guy Henry. Both have more than a little in common with Mr. Stoppard.

Consider the following dialogue: "To value what is relative to your circumstances, and let others value what's relative to theirs — you agree with me," Turgenev says, toward the trilogy's end, to Herzen, who answers him fiercely. "But I fought my way here with loss of blood," he says, "because it matters to me, and you're in my ditch, reposing with your hat over your face, because nothing matters to you very much."

The exchange is thoroughly typical of "Utopia." It is also throughly typical that the argument cannot be completed, both because one of Herzen's daughters has run into the room in a tantrum and because Turgenev's stomach hurts.

Life will keep barging in on the loftiest discussions and the most intricate metaphors. Which is why in the end you are likely to stay on board for the long, long journey that is "Utopia."

The Coast of Utopia:  Shipwreck

  Stephen Dillane and Douglas Henshall

Photo by Alastair Muir

New York Times

Sunday August 4, 2002

A Stoppard Panorama of Russian Idealism

by Benedict Nightingale

TOM STOPPARD is the dramatist who debated the nature of God and good in his "Jumpers," brought Lenin and James Joyce onstage in "Travesties," and somehow made chaos theory, landscape gardening, Byron scholarship and Romanticism his joint subjects in "Arcadia"; but even he admits he has written nothing more ambitious than the trilogy opening at the Royal National Theater this weekend.

"The Coast of Utopia" lasts nine hours, if seen morning, afternoon and evening on a Saturday. It has a cast of 32, involves 70 characters, spans 35 years, and derives from five years of research into the dissidents, idealists and principled fugitives of 19th-century Russia.

Turgenev and Bakunin elbow their way onto the vast Olivier stage in a lavish production by Trevor Nunn, the National's artistic director. So does the literary critic Belinksy, whose decision to return to Russia and subject himself to censorship and danger, rather than crusade for liberty from abroad, first inspired the project. After all, Mr. Stoppard is a Czechoslovak by birth, a close friend of President Vaclav Havel, and has written plays about the predicament of writers in the former Soviet bloc. But he found himself increasingly fascinated by another Russian with whom he could imaginatively identify: Alexander Herzen.

Stephen Dillane takes the role. He won a Tony Award in 2000 for his performance as the mandarin dramatist in Mr. Stoppard's play "The Real Thing," a creation some thought semi-autobiographical. Now his task is to embody an aristocratic socialist, writer and exile in London who held some trademark Stoppard opinions. Herzen didn't say that his distinguishing mark was "an absolute lack of certainty about almost everything," as Mr. Stoppard once did, but he might have endorsed one of the dramatist's recent comments: "I'm a man of many different convictions, and they all co-exist."

"He despised Marx," Mr. Stoppard said in a recent conversation. "He didn't believe there was a set of axioms by which we could live at all times. He knew there would always be values which would conflict yet have validity: liberty versus equality, justice versus mercy. And he became my center in the second and third plays."

These two, "Shipwreck" and "Salvage," should provide fresh evidence of Mr. Stoppard's curiosity and love of philosophy. But the trilogy doesn't aspire to be the bravura intellectual exercise that, say, "Travesties" was. The first act of the opening play, "Voyage," which involves Bakunin and his family circle, is a belated attempt to satisfy what Mr. Stoppard said is every playwright's yearning to be Chekhovian. And since new Russian atrocities in 1861 devastated Herzen by denying him the chance to make peace with a reformist Czar, I would expect the trilogy to remind us that Mr. Stoppard, still sometimes decried as a chilly wit, is the emotionally generous author who recreated the unhappy A. E. Housman in "The Invention of Love."

But "The Coast of Utopia" is also the work of a writer who once said his aim was to reconcile ideas with laughter. Is it, well, funny? Since Herzen apparently said that his happiest memories of England were two brands of mustard and Worcestershire sauce, that doesn't seem unlikely.

"It's more naturalistic and less farcical than some of my work," Mr. Stoppard said. "But there's quite a lot of comedy there. I find it difficult to keep it out."   

Benedict Nightingale is the chief theater critic of The Times of London

The Coast of Utopia:  Salvage

Guy Henry and Stephen Dillane

Photo by Ivan Kyncl, provided by NT

Independent

Saturday August 3, 2002

A theatrical marathon to numb the most cultured bum

How my heart warms to the acting profession to learn that custard will be on constant supply

by David Lister

Today I will do something most people under 25, and a good number over 25, would consider purgatory. I will spend from 11 in the morning until 11 at night in the theatre. That's a lot of time in which to numb even the most cultured bum; but as the venue is the National Theatre, complete with bars, restaurants and riverside walks, and the occasion is the world premiere of a trilogy of plays from Tom Stoppard, it's probably worth the risk.

Theatre marathons can be fraught for both audiences and actors. I remember during the RSC's Nicholas Nickleby cycle some years ago, the actors mingled with the audience between plays (never a good idea, whatever directors might think). A man near me asked one actress who she was playing. "Mrs Nickleby'' snarled the angry performer, who had been on stage for much of the preceding three hours.

At the National today the actors will be rushing from costume and wig changes (Stephen Dillane virtually needs his own follicular agent, with a toupee in one play and extra hair added to his own beard in another) to wolfing down puddings backstage. And how my heart warms to the acting profession to learn from the National that custard will be on constant supply. There goes that ethereal image forever.

For audiences too, theatre marathons take on a distinctive character. Not least, they can be pick-up joints. Only the most bashful of theatregoers can avoid striking up a conversation with the person in the next seat after spending morning, afternoon and evening elbowing them, pushing past them and treading on their toes. Such is the foreplay of a National Theatre audience.

And then, think of the burden on the poor playwright. The National says that we will be seeing three self-contained plays. But Stoppard must know he will have to work that bit harder for a laugh with an audience running into the 10th hour of babysitting fees. Does it impinge upon the playwright's art that the cost of tickets plus meals plus drinks could be well over £100? Ah, Sir Tom, yours is a heavy responsibility today. It's to be hoped that when we all rise at 11pm it will be to give a well deserved ovation to a master of the British stage – and not because we have cramp.

Variety

Saturday August 3, 2002

National Theater Stages Stoppard Marathon

LONDON (Reuters) - The National Theater on Saturday completed a nine-hour, three-part play in a marathon sell-out session, ending with three curtain calls and a standing ovation, a theater spokeswoman said.

With meal breaks, the world premiere of a new work by the Czech-born, British playwright Tom Stoppard lasted a punishing 12 hours.

An estimated 1,000 people attended all three parts of the trilogy in the 1,300 seat Olivier auditorium, with others coming to watch just one or two of the play's parts, the spokeswoman said.

The Coast of Utopia:  Salvage

Stephen Dillane and Lucy Whybrow

Photo by Ivan Kyncl, provided by NT

The atmosphere at the end of the performance was "exhausted but elated," she added.

Stoppard's "The Coast of Utopia" is made up of three self-contained, but sequential plays which trace a group of 19th century Russian radicals caught in a struggle for political freedom.

The production, described by theater bosses as "unbelievably demanding," saw 30 actors playing 70 parts. Backroom staff fitted 416 costumes and 96 wigs.

Stoppard, whose other works include "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead," said his latest work had snowballed from an original idea for a single play.

"I began to think I would need two plays," he told the Daily Telegraph. "Then I thought, let's go for broke."

The back-to-back performance is booked for another eight appearances, though those lacking the nerve for an all-day event can catch each part of the trilogy in separate shows.

Telegraph

Saturday August 3, 2002

National Theatre puts on a 10-hour marathon  (an excerpt)

by Nigel Reynolds

The theatre-going classes, critics, and a complement of 30 actors and almost 50 technicians will be holding their collective breath today in anticipation of one of the most ambitious theatrical projects in this country for a decade.

Starting at 11am, the National Theatre in London will give the first complete public run-through of three new plays by Tom Stoppard.

They form a sweeping sequential trilogy called The Coast of Utopia, on the recondite subject of a group of 19th century Russian radicals and thinkers, and the fight for political emancipation under Tsarist rule.

Only late tonight, after a punishing nine hours of drama, with meal breaks on top, will the world discover whether one of Britain's best loved playwrights, admired for making his audiences feel more intelligent on leaving a theatre than when they went into it, has created a masterpiece or an indulgence...

For the National, where rehearsals started in April and which has had to hire a score of extra backstage staff, the project has been "unbelievably demanding".

Directed by Sir Trevor Nunn, the theatre's boss, the 30 actors play a total of 70 roles. One, Jack James, must play 13 parts across the trilogy. Another, Tom Arnold, has 11 parts but understudies a further 25.

The costume department, which must fit 416 costumes, and the wig department, which will glue on 96 separate hairpieces, decided that they would be too exhausted to have a first night party tonight so they held it last night.

A large dressing room has been put aside to provide actors and technicians with drinks all day to prevent them becoming dehydrated.

The National describes today's marathon as "event theatre", comparable to mounting David Hare's trilogy a decade ago or the Royal Shakespeare Company's epic three-part staging of Nicholas Nickleby 30 years ago.

"We've been building up to this like a pregnancy," said a spokesman. "Everybody is nervous, excited and elated, and on the day we'll feel all that three times worse."

But it is Stoppard's reputation that is most on the line. His theme is the doomed quest for a Utopian society.

His characters, dug up from history, are the anarchists, free-thinkers and revolutionaries of mid-19th century Russia whose struggle for political freedom against Tsarist absolutism saw them imprisoned, exiled and become refugees in London and Paris.

Stoppard, whose previous plays include Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Travesties and Arcadia, said he was fired to the subject five years ago by the late Sir Isaiah Berlin's book of essays, Russian Thinkers, and also by a long-held wish to write in the manner of Chekhov...

With the action set in Moscow, St Petersburg, London and Paris, designer William Dudley has used ground-breaking 3-D video projection to cast moving images across the stage of smoke, rain, snow and a pine forest through which actors can appear.

Stoppard's theme about the impossibility of founding the perfect society continues by showing the discrepancy between his characters' messy, sometime hypocritical personal lives and their idealistic political statements.

The trilogy will run until at least the middle of October. A further eight all-day Saturday complete performances are planned and the three plays, Voyage, Shipwreck and Salvage will also be performed in repertory during the week.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rehearsal photos by Ivan Kyncl for the NT

Whatsonstage

Monday August 5, 2002

Stars Turn Out for Stoppard's Utopia Marathon

by Terri Paddock

One of the arts events of the year - the world premiere of Tom Stoppard's 19th-century Russian trilogy, The Coast of Utopia, directed by outgoing artistic director Trevor Nunn - drew the great and good from the theatre world to the National Theatre (pictured) on the South Bank this past Saturday, 3 August 2002.

National Theatre

A bevy of celebrities - including previous NT artistic directors Peter Hall and Richard Eyre; actors Olivia Williams, Neil Pearson, Imogen Stubbs (wife of Nunn) and Phyllida Law; feminist Germaine Greer; film director Mike Nicholls and his wife, American TV anchor Diane Sawyer; and a Broadway contingency led by Bernard Gersten, executive producer of the Lincoln Center (which has mounted the US premieres of numerous Stoppard plays) - joined national and international critics for a theatre marathon.

With all three plays - Voyage, Shipwreck and Salvage - performed in succession, the marathon lasted twelve hours in total, starting at 11.00am and ending at 11.00pm, with some nine hours of performance broken up by intervals and meal breaks. At the end of Saturday's event, the exhausted audience enthusiastically applauded the Herculean efforts of the company as well as their own endurance.

Five years in the researching and writing, The Coast of Utopia is a sweeping epic about Russian intelligentsia, covering three decades of philosophy, politics, revolution and romance. The 30-strong company - which includes Stephen Dillane, Douglas Henshall, Guy Henry, John Carlisle, Raymond Coulthard, Eve Best, Charlotte Emerson and Anna Maxwell-Martin - perform in all three plays, portraying an assortment of 70 characters between them.

Author Stoppard has had several successful premieres at the National, including Arcadia, On the Razzle and, most recently, The Invention of Love. Amongst his other plays are Indian Ink, Jumpers, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Travesties. Stoppard has also scored big with his screenwriting on films such as Enigma, Shakespeare in Love and The Russia House.

The Coast of Utopia plays, continuing in repertory at the NT Olivier, can be seen individually or as a whole. There are eight more full "trilogy days" currently planned. The August dates (on 17, 24 and 31) are now sold out, but booking is open for September (7 and 14) and October (5, 12 and 19) with further dates expected for November 2002.

 

Read the play.

USA

UK

Coast of Utopia - Voyage

This book may be unavailable in the US.

Coast of Utopia - Shipwreck

This book may be unavailable in the US.

Coast of Utopia - Salvage

This book may be unavailable in the US.

     

This page was last updated on December 31, 2002.    

Back to top

 

E-mail comments

 

ENTER PAGE          HOME          FILMS & TV          THEATRE          DATELINE          RADIO & AUDIO BOOKS          SITE NOTES

ARCHIVE          AWARDS          PAST SITE UPDATES          RELATED LINKS          SEARCH          TIMELINE

WWW.STEPHENDILLANE.COM