|
|
|
|||||
|
Financial Times Monday December 30, 2002 THE ARTS: Bumpy ride still offered many thrills (an excerpt) by Alastair Macaulay Some plays lodge lines or images in your head. I find myself still recalling Penelope Wilton, as Sonya in Brian Friel's Afterplay, speaking with quiet tenderness of Astrov, the man she has loved for 20 years, as "a man with a vision, a close to saintliness, and not always sober". Or Stephen Dillane as Herzen drawing Tom Stoppard's Coast of Utopia to a close by saying "History knocks at a thousand gates at every moment, and the gatekeeper is chance. We need wit and courage to make our way while our way is making us. A distant end is not an end but a trap. The end we work for must be closer, the labourer's wage, the pleasure in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness." ... I count myself privileged just to have heard and seen these moments, and doubly privileged to have the responsibility of reviewing them. A fellow critic contacted me this autumn; he was preparing a piece on "What's wrong with British theatre?" and wanted to know my thoughts on the subject. But my immediate response was to ask him to tell me what, if anything, is wrong with it? ... How much can be wrong with British theatre when the past year has brought us premieres by Alan Ayckbourn, Caryl Churchill, Brian Friel, David Hare; a miniature by Harold Pinter, and a whole trilogy by Tom Stoppard? And acting by Judi Dench, Stephen Dillane, Michael Gambon, Clare Higgins, John Hurt, Vanessa Redgrave, Mark Rylance, Maggie Smith, Penelope Wilton? Sure, some of those plays and some of those performances were minor - Dench and Smith in Hare's The Breath of Life may have done the biggest advance sale in West End history, yet turned out to be just a charming non-event - but they alone ensure that London remains the theatre capital of the world. And there has been much else. ... The whole year has been one of transition to an uncertain future. The National Theatre is drawing its Trevor Nunn era to a close and preparing for its Nicholas Hytner regime; the Donmar Warehouse has only just begun a new regime under Michael Grandage; the Hampstead Theatre is being rebuilt, and the Almeida Theatre has been closed for extensive rebuilding all year. These are the theatres that do most to generate energy. We may be preparing for a new phase of theatre glory, but don't count on it. In the meantime, hang on to the most luminous images of the past year: "the pleasure in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness". |
Time Sunday November 24, 2002 That Old Feeling: Theater Past, Theater Perfect (an excerpt) Richard Corliss on the new season of London plays Have you ever traveled 6,000 miles to attend a single cultural event? I did, last month. The event was "The Coast of Utopia," a trilogy of Tom Stoppard plays directed by Trevor Nunn for the National Theatre in London. With a running (or ambling) time of 9hrs.30min, a cast of 30 adults and 15 children, and an elaborate physical production, "The Coast of Utopia" was unlikely to be mounted anywhere else. I had to be there. Besides, I owed Stoppard. Since the mid-60s, with "Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," he has gifted me and countless others with some of the most intelligent, playful, sublime evenings of theater: "Jumpers," "The Real Thing" and the never-to-be-topped "Arcadia," to name three of a dozen offspring of his fertile imagination. Seized by the irresistible impulse to find out what Stoppard had in mind about 19th century Russian socialists, and abetted by the gracious offices of Aisha Labi, TIME Europe's Florence Nightingale for wayward visitors, I entered the National bunker for my Stoppard marathon one autumn Saturday morning. Morning? Ah, that was the final lure: True acolytes could spend all day and most of the night on that Utopian coast. On weekdays, one or two of the plays were performed, but each Saturday the National put on a grand Stoppardian bouffe. The first of the trilogy, "Voyage," began at 11 and ended at 2:15; the second part, "Shipwreck," commenced at 3:15 and went till 6:30; and the finale, "Salvage," started at 7:30 and let out around 10:45. As a theater-binger from way back (the Royal Shakespeare Company's "Nicholas Nickleby," Bill Bryden's production of "The Miracles" for the National), I welcomed the chance for total immersion in non-stop-Stoppard with 2500 like-minded pilgrims. "The Coast of Utopia" was part of a trifecta of new works by top English playwrights. London this fall also has on offer "A Number" by Caryl Churchill — of "Cloud Nine" and "Top Girls" glory —and David Hare's "The Breath of Life," a star vehicle for Maggie Smith and Judi Dench. (Would you import the Irishman Brian Friel to join this exalted company? I wouldn't, quite, but Friel had a new piece too: "Afterplay," a slight memory-play with old charmers John Hurt and Penelope Wilton as characters from Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard" and "Three Sisters.") . . . PAST PERFECT The early word on "The Coast of Utopia" was daunting: a nine-hour political debate, freely adapted from Isaiah Berlin's book of essay on "Russian Thinkers." Alexander Herzen, Mikhail Bakunin, Peter Chaadaev, Nicholas Ogarev: discuss their theories of social progress. Anyone? Anyone? Before seeing the plays I boned up on 19th century Russian radicals by reading the fact-packed 88-page program; by the time the lights went down Saturday morning, I felt ready to be a contestant on "Masterminds." Only with Stoppard does the theatergoer have to cram for a show. Not to worry. As with Stoppard's last play, "The Invention of Love," the degree of difficulty here was exaggerated. Stoppard is a superb teacher, but he's mainly a showman, a seducer, an intellectual spieler who doesn't dare lose his engaged audience for a moment. Though the play spans 35 years, six countries and a dozen or so complex political philosophies, the contours are clear. Alexander Herzen (played by Stephen Dillane with that knowing, helpless smile he put to such attentive use in the recent revival of "The Real Thing") loves the play of ideas, loves the possibility for constructive social change, loves his wife and children more. The discovery of an infidelity wounds him like the news of a Tsarist outrage; the shipwreck of his deaf child collapses upon him like the failed revolutions of 1848. The first words of the first play — "Speaking of which..." — cue "The Coast of Utopia" as part of an ongoing debate, passionate and civilized and open to irrelevancies. The trilogy celebrates the fine art of talking: rhetoric, invective, verbal violence and flirtation, impromptu essays that generate heat and light. Much of modernist art, and nearly all of popular culture, is suspicious of articulation. Modernism says that art and passion are precisely those things that can't be put into words; that the roiling impulses that rule are lives are either ineffable or just F---able. But the history of theater is an honor roll of articulate talk; the Greeks and Shakespeare, Corneille and Shaw thought so, and Stoppard is their avatar. Not talk for talk's sake — though why not, when he's so good at it? — but to clarify thorny ideas and to reveal thickety feelings. In "Utopia," the men argue politics, spot lapses in their opponents' logic while stitching up the holes in their own. Or they follow the train of a piquant proposition and find they have talked themselves into a terminus. Do they contradict themselves? Very well, they contradict themselves. And they have such fun doing so; this is revolution as parlor sport. But the chat has gravity, for at issue is the question of how men shall live. Stoppard, himself a child refugee from the Soviet bloc, has embraced liberal humanism — human-ness, humaneness — in all his work. At the very end of the trilogy, when he bequeaths Herzen one final speech to rebut Marx's theory of historical inevitability, Stoppard is doubtless speaking for himself in articulating an enlightened middle way, the heroism of small graces: "But history has no culmination! There is always as much in front as behind. There is no libretto. History knocks at a thousand gates at every moment, and the gatekeeper is chance. ... We need wit and courage to make our way while our way is making us. ... What kind of beast is this ... this Moloch who promises us that everything will be beautiful after we're dead? A distant end is not an end but a trap. The end we work for must be closer: the labourer's wage, the pleasure in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness... we have to open men's eyes and not tear them out." And the women: do they get to talk? Yes, and when they do a small smile plays on their faces, as if they know that their matters of the heart will create more joy and crush more souls than "Das Kapital." Yes, their coquettery and evasions can exasperate men looking for an unequivocal answer to riddles of life and love. And when men have triumphed in their arguments with women, the women play their ace: they say, as Molly Bloom did, "Yes." This is the last word of the first and third "Utopia" plays; in each case it is spoken indulgently, as a mother would to calm a child's questing, questioning spirit. The political theories of Bakunin, Herzen and their coteries were expressions of a dream for universal betterment. As Shaw and Stoppard know, men are the dreamers, women the realists. Women are the land men return to when Utopia has faded or their ship foundered. FUTURE CONDITIONAL I find that I am romanticizing my reaction to "The Coast of Utopia." The trilogy is perhaps an hour, perhaps a play, too long. But I know why I am in a mood to wave away what I might have considered its excesses and obscurities. I just realized that the play is closing today, and may never be performed again (though a New York visit has been discussed). It is as if a dear friend, who had enthralled and exasperated me, who talked so fast and stayed so long, were suddenly reported absent, or missing, or lost at sea. Would I think of his faults? No, I would enumerate his virtues, in grief and gratitude. As I type these words on a Saturday morning on an island in the Caribbean, it is noon at the National Theatre; the characters and the play are young, full of hope and vinegar. As my editor reads this column just after noon, the 1848 Revolution is giving Marx and his followers some brazen ideas, and a dear, deaf, dead child is wandering through the inaudible murmur of adult conversation. And if you, reader, happen to be scanning these words at sunset on Saturday, know that the cast is taking one last bow, and the audience — many, I'll warrant, who have seen the trilogy before and have returned for a last glimpse of the monument — is rising to salute the heroic craft of the author and actors. What is to become of this monument? Edwin Booth said an actor was "a sculptor in snow." The gifted company of "The Coast of Utopia" sculpted a grand and intimate panorama of 19th century Europe from the marble of Stoppard's teeming brain. Tonight at 11, the sculpture begins to melt. It may be frozen — a living frieze — in the memories of those who saw the piece assembled, five nights a week and three times on Saturday. It is can be admired in its one official preserved form, on paper, and surely the plays read wonderfully in their published form. But print is both the fetus and the ghost of a theater piece. Reading a play, you know what it means but not how it feels. The thrilling and melancholy fact is, you have to be there: in a crowd, watching these actors recombine uniquely, with all of tonight's little gaffes and unexpected epiphanies, at this moment, for their art and your pleasure. At its best a play restores, for a few hours, the age of belief. It gives you the shiver of a sacred rite, in a secular cathedral, and what you experience is communion. Can't get that with a book, where it's just you and the words. Can't get it at the movies, where the performers have been caught in aspic, and the snowman is cryogenically preserved. Only theater traps and enfolds you in the present tense — and then it is past. It is the special gift of those who visited the National Theatre to know how the ship rocked, what birds of political fancy flew overhead, and when the rainbow of intellect and heart shone as we sailed past the coast of Utopia. |
|
|||||
|
|||||
UPI Tuesday August 27, 2002 Theater: 'The Coast of Utopia' by Stephen Brown LONDON, Aug. 27 (UPI) -- Theater on a grand scale implicitly rebukes those who would treat drama as a diversion. In very different ways, Goethe's "Faust," Ibsen's "Peer Gynt," Wagner's operas, and the daylong mystery cycles still occasionally revived in York and Chester all lay claim to a reach and seriousness too great for the usual evening-show-with-dinner-to-follow routine. "The Coast of Utopia," Tom Stoppard's new trilogy about the personal and private struggles of Russia's mid-19th century intelligentsia belongs to this same genre of event theater. London's National Theatre has added to the sense of occasion by opening the trilogy at the beginning of August, when London theater is generally quiet and the media turns its attention to the carnival mish-mash of Edinburgh's overlapping arts festivals. As several critics have commented, "The Coast of Utopia" bears an unhappy resemblance to the bourgeois radicals it chronicles: relentless and sometimes magnificent in its ambition, rather less successful in its concrete achievements. Yet it is also rich and fascinating, the work of a writer in his fifth decade of productivity extending and risking his writing at a time when most of his generation of British playwrights seem sadly diminished. It raises the question why a writer so distant from the grand seriousness and self-assertion of this kind of theater -- a writer whose plays are often scintillating chamber pieces -- should decide to write an epic. The marketing material for "The Coast of Utopia" claims that it consists of "three sequential self-contained plays" but one senses that this formulation derives more from a fear of intimidating the audience than the nature of the plays themselves. "The Coast of Utopia" is really a single 9-hour play, with an architecture that needs to be taken as a whole, sweeping from youth to age and from hope through catastrophe to renewed but chastened effort. With the help of Trevor Nunn's dynamic and fleet-footed direction and William Dudley's cinematic design work, projecting moving video backdrops onto a curving backdrop, it cuts a swathe through European history, following a cast of more than 90 speaking characters from 1833 to 1865. The first play, "Voyage," centers on the impetuous young radical Michael Bakunin (Douglas Henshall), his rebellion powered by a terrifying, blind egotism and the heady philosophical romanticism of German idealism. While he enthuses about the philosophies of Schelling, Fichte and Hegel, each suggesting a different view about the nature of self and reality, Bakunin's selfishness in the mundane world wrecks the marital prospects of his doting sisters and makes him a continual burden on his friends. The second play, "Shipwreck," continues to follow Bakunin but turns its attention more to the liberal socialist Alexander Herzen (a performance of intelligence and conviction from Stephen Dillane), Stoppard's hero, who had been exiled by the autocratic czar during the action of most of the first play. The title alludes to a double disaster. The disappointed dream of the 1848 revolution in Paris, in which both Bakunin and Herzen participated, occupies the first half of the play. The second half turns to Herzen's personal calamity: the near-collapse of his marriage and then, through accident and illness, the precipitous loss of most of his family. "Salvage," the third play, follows Herzen to London, where his money and sardonic intelligence make him a focus of the community of European radicals -- including Karl Marx, the French socialist Louis Blanc and the Italian nationalist Giuseppe Mazzini -- taking refuge there. As he campaigns at a distance for the emancipation of the serfs, a new generation of nihilists and militant socialists, deriding the efforts of "repentant gentry" like Herzen, foreshadow the Russian Revolution to come. At the heart of his enterprise lies Stoppard's wish to celebrate and explore a more benign kind of political radicalism in Russia that offers a tantalizing alternative to the revolution of 1917. With the delusions of communist utopianism in mind, "The Coast of Utopia" repeatedly contrasts idealism, in politics, philosophy and love, with messy reality. This is epic, historical theater written by someone who does not believe that history has logic or form. Chance regularly intrudes into the narrative. At one point Stoppard memorably personifies history as a huge ginger cat, playing with us and killing us at its whim. The scenes have an overlapping, chaotic quality of that owes an obvious debt to Chekhov. As ever, Stoppard juxtaposes big ideas with small, significant things -- a dropped penknife that becomes a mistaken love-token or the tuberculosis bacillus that foreshortens several characters' lives -- to suggest the sheer vanity of grand schemes. Moment to moment, there is no question of Stoppard's assured skill. His dialogue is as witty and pithy as ever, his sense of comic absurdity undimmed. The sheer range of information he is able to bring to the stage is remarkable, guiding the audience with insouciant ease through the fashions of German philosophy, the fraught world of Russian literature and political publishing and the machinations of 19th century European political history. Alongside Bakunin and Herzen, he creates two other rich and attractive main characters -- the nervous and furious critic Vissarion Belinksy (Will Keen on superbly splenetic form), and the wry, non-committal writer Ivan Turgenev (a gentlemanly Guy Henry) -- as well as scores of secondary ones. The work's vices are born of passion. It is often as if Stoppard has fallen in love with his material and his characters to the point that he seems unwilling to leave anything out. Do we really need to know so much about Bakunin's family life, once the central point about his selfishness has been made? How interesting is Natalie Herzen's adulterous love affair with the narcissistic German poet George Herwegh? Stoppard binds together his narrative by repeating scenes, situations and symbols and by experimenting further, as in "Arcadia" and "The Invention of Love," with looping time schemes, but there are times when "The Coast of Utopia" sprawls. The trilogy's most serious failing stems from Stoppard's hatred of communism. Stoppard's Turgenev extols the virtues of refusing to take sides, but it is not advice Stoppard takes himself. Marx -- like the Slavophile thinker who appears briefly at the beginning of the second play -- is reduced to a caricature. Herzen, on the other hand, is too clearly the author's mouthpiece, given speech after speech attacking utopian delusion. Worse still, though it does convey what life was like for its middle-class heroes living under a repressive regime, "The Coast of Utopia" barely bothers to represent the sufferings of the serfs or the working classes who give the revolutionaries their political urgency. This may be true to the narrow experiences of the revolutionaries themselves, but it makes the case for gradual, peaceful change too easy and the demands of the new generation of revolutionaries seem needlessly strident. When communism and grand political dreaming are anyway generally discredited, Stoppard's insistence on attacking them has the air of knocking on an open door. In the end, "The Coast of Utopia" is successful almost in spite of its ideas. And although grossly overlong, the trilogy's force derives from its epic sweep. For Stoppard's real theme is not so much political or intellectual as emotional and personal. In the third, most coherent, part of the trilogy, we see Herzen, a man who has lived through long years of happiness and suffering, first giving into apathy and then being spurred on to fight again. At its best, "The Coast of Utopia" extols a virtue that only epic theatre can truly show: persistence. By the end -- in one of his few ideologically surprising moments -- Stoppard comes to admire even the unwearying, irrepressible energy of Bakunin's lunatic enthusiasms. Survival and tenacity are an older writer's themes. In his curious, uneven, sometimes brilliant epic, Stoppard has given them moving expression. |
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|||||
|
Rehearsal photos by Ivan Kyncl for the NT |
|
||||||
| This page was last updated on December 31, 2002. |
ENTER PAGE HOME FILMS & TV THEATRE DATELINE RADIO & AUDIO BOOKS SITE NOTES
ARCHIVE AWARDS PAST SITE UPDATES RELATED LINKS SEARCH TIMELINE